Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moriah Mills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moriah Mills[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod, but meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep meets WP:GNG between multiple notable professional roles and awares. Dr. Vetter (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep per wp:gng and wp:entertainer ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 18:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is too low level and routine to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep per wp:gng and wp:entertainer. Shameran81 (talk) 23:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is negligible coverage of her in genuine independent reliable sources. The coverage that exists is in promotional porn trade publications and "big breast" fetish publications. Neither group of publications have a reputation for accuracy required for establishing notabilty. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sources covering this person are too low in quality to support WP:BASIC, WP:NACTOR or WP:MUSICBIO notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the only coverage is in unreliable sources, meaning she fails GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.