Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Peck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss South Dakota. MBisanz ^talk 17:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Peck[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The winners of US state level beauty pageants are not default notable. There is nothing else besides winning Miss South Dakota that distinguishes Peck at all. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:PERSON. Blythwood (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: But I am seeing a lot of discussion at WikiProject Beauty pageants to the effect that state-level winners are notable, and we are seeing navboxes for these as well. So I think a RfC is in order. Montanabw ^(talk) 18:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss South Dakota Definitely not notable enough for a separate article. Subjects best known for winning a state level pageant are not inherently notable. I would prefer a redirect to Miss South Dakota instead of outright deletion as a mention is already present on the target page (in the list of winners).--Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss South Dakota; valid search term, and the subject is listed there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.