Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/More/less
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Soft delete. LFaraone 23:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
More/less[edit]
- More/less (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable sculpture. DoctorKubla (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This clearly fails WP:GNG. The artists do not have articles and if they are not notable, then their work most likely is not notable on its own. This is obviously a case of WP:TOOSOON. It looks like an interesting work of art but Wikipedia is not the place to establish notability. freshacconci talktalk 15:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.