Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morbidgames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Morbidgames[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporate article was created by a SPA burner account in 2008. At the time, Geni tagged it as needing sourcing improvement, but the SPA promptly removed the tag. Article is sourced entirely to (a) press releases, (b) other Wikipedia articles, (c) broken links to non-RS websites, (d) a Craigslist ad, (e) ecommerce websites. A basic BEFORE fails to discover any RS. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 05:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As the nominator says, current sources are poor and I am unable to find any better ones. Seems like a clear fail of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Hug^syrup 10:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As stated by the nomination, the sources being used in the article are not valid to establish notability, as none of them appear to be from reliable secondary sources. Additionally their biggest claim to notability is being the runner up for a non-notable award. There are no additional reliable sources that I can find discussing the company in any depth, and as the team appears to have disbanded, there very likely never will be. Rorshacma (talk) 16:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.