Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moosa Anwar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Editor if willing may request to userfy the contents at WP:REFUND. Mkdw ^talk 17:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moosa Anwar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted once in 2009. New article fails to bring up any new notability except a bunch of passing mentions as someone who has filed a case against a political candidate. WP:ROUTINE coverage as a political party member (but not an elected one), no substantive coverage as someone notable in and of themselves. The article is also apparently self created and reads like a LinkDIn profile more than an encyclopedia article. WP:COI Several of the sources are facebook and tumblr accounts. WP:RS It would need a fundamental rewrite for inclusion and then it would still be of questionable notability WP:BIO Savonneux (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article has too many problems to exist as it is. It is completely WP:AB, and additionally is fairly dependent on WP:NONENG. I would suggest the creator instead go through the process at WP:AFC to help correct all these problems before recreating this. --Holdek (talk) 06:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Userfy per nom and above editor. Gene93k's suggestion that the editor go through AfC is a good one. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per rationale by @Holdek. Quis separabit? 14:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.