Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monterey Amberjacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pecos League. MBisanz ^talk 00:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monterey Amberjacks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the absence of references and in the absence of additional information other than the league (which is not part of the MLB system), does not appear to be notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable just as any other professional baseball team, regardless of affiliation with MLB. The team's website is listed. Jamesmiko (talk) 19:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect to Pecos League - Does not meet notability criteria. A minor league team that has yet to take the field is not as notable "as any other professional baseball team". An organization's own website is not verifiable, objective evidence.--Rpclod (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modified to agree with Spanneraol and Eggishorn. My only additional comment is that, even if and when a team is formed, suitable notability criteria must be met.-Rpclod (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pecos League until such time as more references can be identified. Spanneraol (talk) 21:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Makes no sense to delete the page of an announced team in an established league. Either additional information will be coming soon or the team will fold and the page can be deleted then. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pecos League as Spanneraol suggests. Independent League teams are notoriously unstable, and there isn't any indication of notability yet. If and when they actually put a team into play, then they can be re-created. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.