Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mont Vert Tropez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mont Vert Tropez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. PROD removed by creator, no reason given or credible assertion of notability. Just another housing development: references given just to back figure for gross floor area and nature of locale. Verges on the promotional, but I think this is just that there's nothing to say about the place save guff from estate agents. TheLongTone (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This should have hit CSD, but still. Not notable at all. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not Notable. Appears to be an advertisement.Preetikapoor0 (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above. It is an advertisement. Jethwarp (talk) 06:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.