Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsoon Salon & Spa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monsoon Salon & Spa[edit]

Monsoon Salon & Spa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising The Banner talk 22:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unambiguous promotion. Look at the history, and the three main contributors only edit this article. Suspect sockpuppet at work. --Dmol (talk) 23:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 23:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 23:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above - promo that belongs elsewhere. –Davey2010(talk) 00:52, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORP lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The guideline specifically notes the kind of trival coverage listed here as quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization. The first Vogue cite references an article that has only a single sentence about Monsoon Salon & Spa, which sentence is mostly about Rod Anker. The second Vogue cite references an article that does not mention Monsoon Salon & Spa at all, and just has a picture of Rod Anker. The cited Times of India article mentions Monsoon Salon & Spa only in passing in an article on why one should indulge in spa treatments. The Indiantimes website has no coverage of Monsoon Salon & Spa. In the first Business Standard cited article Rod Anker, their creative director is quoted in an article on anti-ageing facials. The second Business Standard cited article is slightly more substantial announcing Monsoon Salon and Spa has been awarded with the 'Best Spa and Salon Chain in Delhi' title for the year 2013 by World Travel Brands at Hotel Radisson Blu, New Delhi. Of the long list of awards present in the article, some are won not by the Monsoon Salon & Spa, but by individuals who at the time or currently work there, others are mere runners up, and not actual awards. --Bejnar (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.