Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsieur Stigmonus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monsieur Stigmonus[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. The PROD was removed with no useful rationale despite my explicit request to add one or comment on talk :( _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An extremely minor character that only appeared in a small handful of issues. There is absolutely no coverage in reliable sources that I can find. Even fansites and the DC Wiki have virtually no information on the character, he is so non-notable. Rorshacma (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rational given by Rorshacma. Mostly lack of any coverage on the character. Including in places where there normally would be if the person was notable, like fansites and DC Wiki. Plus, even if there was sources the article is massively over narrative or whatever and would take a fundamental re-rewrite to fit Wikipedia guidelines. So, I think WP:TNT would apply here as much as a lack of notability does. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Best source I can find describes itself as Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Appears to have appeared in exactly six comic book issues, and has gained no reliable coverage. This is up there with Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard and Ohtar plumbed the depths of obscurity, but this is giving them a run for their money. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.