Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monroe transfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monroe transfer[edit]

Unverifiable. It's been an orphan for months; I found it via good ol' Special:Random. There will never be a reliable source for this nonsense. Melchoir 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, seems to be non-notable neologism --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lustcruft. Reyk 06:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Requires a citation and reference to be considered legitimate. (aeropagitica) 06:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as non-notable neologism. There are some urban dictionary-type links but I doubt this is used other than rhetorically, and as such would need to be transwikied to Wiktionary anyway. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-03-22 07:16Z
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.