Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey testing vs gorilla testing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey testing vs gorilla testing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Load of nonsense. Standard testing technique given a fashionable name by software group and then promoted as notable. Fails WP:GNG scope_creep (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Little evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Good grief. No. Entirely made-up, and whatever it got right is already covered by Fuzzing Mduvekot (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 13:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete poorly sourced neologism article with significant WP:OR content. Monkey testing has a referenced article, and RS coverage. 'Gorilla testing' has a few mentions in books (1 2 3) and numerous hits for low quality blogs, Q/A sites, and forums. Overall, it looks like Gorilla Testing is borderline in coverage for having its own article, but there is definitely not enough RS coverage comparing the two systems for a comparison article.Dialectric (talk) 13:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not used be enough reliable sources as per above. W Nowicki (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.