Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique DeMoan (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" is incomprehensible. Sandstein 22:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monique DeMoan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. Little independent reliable sourcing. Only well-sourced information is limited to the fact that her porn performer husband committed suicide. Deleted in 2007, then restored in 2009 based on now-deprecated multiple nominations standard. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 23:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets of WP:COMMON. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subtropical-man - You do realize WP:COMMON redirects to Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means? .... and you do realize IAR/that essay doesn't apply to BLPs up for deletion? ...so as it stands your !vote doesn't make the blindest bit of sense .... –Davey2010^Talk 22:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails PORNBIO with just scene-related award nominations. Fails GNG with only incidental mentions by reliable sources. No significant coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.