Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Roccaforte (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. For one year in case it becomes notable after all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Roccaforte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Previously deleted unanimously. No awards or nominations. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits, just passing mentions in articles about other people. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but if this is consistently being recreated, maybe salt it, or do a redirect to... something ... to not leave the redlink as a temptation for round 4, 5, and 6. Montanabw^(talk) 04:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability. Salt too. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the notability requirements for pornographic actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.