Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Aissa Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Aissa Martinez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a visual artist, not making or sourcing any strong claim to passage of WP:CREATIVE. The notability claim on offer here is that she exists, with no indication whatsoever that she's achieved anything (e.g. significant art awards, major exhibitions, etc.) that would make her existence encyclopedically noteworthy -- and the sourcing consists of three local human interest pieces in her hometown local media, being used entirely to support background trivia on her family life and personal hobbies rather than any potentially notability-building information about her work as an artist. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to contain much more substance and much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - An emerging artist at the beginning of her career who does meet criteria #4 of WP:NARTIST as her work is in several notable museum collections. I added content + references for the Tucson Museum of Art and Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art and New Mexico State University Museum to the article. More collections are noted here.[1]. A review here [2]. Netherzone (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the collections added by Netherzone satisfy WP:NARTIST. I also added a link to an exhibition. The article probably needs some TLC but the notability is there. Lamona (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep her work is in the collection of several notable museums and there is sufficient (albeit not a much) coverage in independent, reliable source to base an article on. Vexations (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly Passes WP:NARTIST She is notable for her works, and has been mentioned in various art galleries and exhibitions, which are cited in as well.Juggyevil (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, museum collections, page improvements, and discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.