Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mong Manith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mong Manith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not shown, bare, one-source references. Garchy (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ..... I don't think I'll ever understand why his parents named him "Mong", Out of all the names in the world!, Anyway back on topic this is full of nothing but red links and over-promotional crap, No evidence of notability Fails NMUSIC & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly non-notable. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's WP:FANCRUFT and contains much WP:OR I would say, no newspaper would print this type of detailed info. According to this blogpost Manith had "2,000+ iTunes playbacks" of his songs in 2013. That doesn't seem to be that much, or is It? Kraxler (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (I've proposed this AfD, so I'm obviously for delete). Additionally, most of the edits on this page are by a user named "Mong Manith", which violates username policy as well as posing a problem with WP:COI.Garchy (talk) 14:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.