Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Money Art[edit]

Non-notable artwork by non-notable designer Somno (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable neologism coined (sic) by someone for their "art". Ohconfucius (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be attempt at re-making page on Glenda Murray Kelly, already speedied twice, as not notable. Author of articles is the same User talk:Gparis and would appear to have a WP:COI problem.-Hunting dog (talk) 06:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NOTE; neologism, no sources. Ғїяеѕкатея^talk 11:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely agree with Hunting dog. See User_talk:Gparis. User created article on the artist twice which was deleted both times and then makes this article. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.