Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molotov21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 13:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Molotov21[edit]
- Molotov21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable third party sources. I spent a few mins checking for some yet no luck. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 08:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage that would establish notability. They exists as this mentions them. But I'm not surprised a music label that only formed in June 2011 has no significant coverage. -- 16:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.