Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Stewart (pornographic actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Stewart (pornographic actress)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Porn actor with insufficient mainstream coverage to pass WP:NBIO (WP:PORNBIO is deprecated). 1292simon (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 06:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete failing WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. Just a typical porn performer with typical coverage (porn interviews, press releases, film databases). Independent RS coverage is nil. Achievements would not even satisfy the now-deprecated PORNBIO SNG. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not seeing enough here yet to satisfy WP:GNG. Right cite (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-

1. Porn actress with award nominations in major porn award schemes like AVN Awards and XBIZ Awards. 2. Recognized as the first-ever host of the virtual XBIZ Awards organized by MyFreeCams.com. 3. Named as 2019 Twistys Treat of the Year by popular porn website Twistys. 4. Worked with all the known porn houses including Digital Playground, Mofos, Reality Kings, Manyvids, Playboy, Babes, Brazzers 5. Paases WP:GNG, multiple nominees of a notable award scheme NB: Do not mistake her persons bearing the name Molly Stewart like https://clarksonathletics.com/sports/womens-basketball/roster/molly-stewart/6544 and https://muckrack.com/molly-stewart/articles Ajpoundz (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porn award nominations were removed from PORNBIO years ago because they are given out too prolifically to be a credible indicator of notability. AVN nominates 15 candidates per category (as many as 20 for GayVN). Everybody (especially every major studio) gets nominated for something. XBIZ nominations come from XBIZ clients. In-house employee of the month awards like Twistys did not pass PORNBIO when it was in effect. PORNBIO was taken down altogether in 2019. Achievements without independent RS acknowledgement don't establish notability. That applies to WP:ENT and WP:ANYBIO as well as the now deprecated PORNBIO SNG. WP:GNG/WP:BASIC comes from significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, not present in the article nor found in independent searching. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we have gotten rid of the horrible porn notification guidelines and have stopped treating the promotionalist schemes of the pornography industry as in any way a sign of notability. There is not actual indepdent sourcing here that would lead to passing GNG. Wikipedia needs to stop being a front for the pornography industry.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@John Pack Lambert (talk), are you against the article or you are against pornography? This is weird.Ajpoundz (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am against the misuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes and the sourcing of articles to promotional schemes, which this article represents.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we used to treat porn like we treat professional wrestling. Now we don't. The sources are kayfabe. One day, we'll figure out wrestling too. 174.212.238.226 (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: The incoming Molly Stewart redirect was targeted to Angel (1984 film) before the porn performer article was created. It this article is deleted, the redirect should be reverted. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no sources to be found to support this person's notability. Simply being mentioned in porn press releases, and being nominate for porn awards, are not enough. Zaathras (talk) 03:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately, it’s not up to snuff per sourcing. Trillfendi (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gene93k. --SarojOffl (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.