Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mollie O'Brien

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 03:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mollie O'Brien[edit]

Mollie O'Brien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page created by banned/blocked user MusicLover650. ~UserDe (talk) 20:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as meeting WP:MUSICBIO. Unfortunate that it was created by a multiple-account user and if this was a brand new article that may be appropriate, but this is an article that has been around a while. I did remove the Grammy win, as the award was only presented to the producer of the album, not the ensemble of musicians.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 03:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep – article was not created in violation of a block or ban, has been substantially edited by others, and the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO. The G5 argument should be used sparingly, and should only be applied to clear-cut cases. Wikipedia is about the content, not the contributors. Linguisttalk|contribs 03:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per MUSICBIO #8, and probably a few other criteria on MUSICBIO. South Nashua (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.