Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molinology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, as there's now a unanimous move to do so. Flowerparty■ 07:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Molinology

Pseudo-definition already at Wiktionary with a little additional information found at Mill BigBlueFish 21:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep A little obscure, but appears to be an actual field of study. Article should be expanded a bit. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 23:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Flowerparty■ 12:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per OhNo. --Hyphen5 13:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's definitely an academic field, or at least an area of interest for some. I have cleaned up the article and stubbed and catted it. --BillC 14:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll add: the individual named in the article as having coined the term seems to have been an academic with some notability in his own right: João Miguel dos Santos Simões --BillC 14:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep in response to the cleanup by BillC. This makes it seem much more notable now - good job! BigBlueFish 14:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep per OhNo et al. Bucketsofg 15:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep seems fine. JeffBurdges 15:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and clean-up per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 17:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep nothing's wrong. Newyorktimescrossword

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.