Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mokhless Al-Hariri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mokhless Al-Hariri[edit]
- Mokhless Al-Hariri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
All in text references point back to this article; no notability has been established. Mazeau (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How do they all refer back to the same thing? I found a bunch of articles & sites about this guy, and i've included them in there... what else does it need? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baronsamedi88 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete None of the sources seems reliable. I see
a forum,a couple Amazon links, a list of pamphlets, and a press release. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 17:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Fair enough, but there is the MIT site for the Aga Khan stuff, the Hala something foundation, the piccolo spoelto thing, and i could also put some more documents in when i get them in the next twenty minutes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baronsamedi88 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- They still don't seem all that reliable. The MIT site is a press release, and the hala foundation link seems to be a primary source. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 19:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Sean Whitton / 10:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Given the time this has been open and the continuing lack of sources to meet WP:RS I don't see a case for keeping. If that case is made then the article can be added back. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.