Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moist Vagina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, I couldn't find any place to put the content (All Apologies is about the song, not the single). -- lucasbfr ^talk 03:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Moist Vagina

Moist Vagina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable song. I guess this'll be kept, though, because there's an incredible WP:BIAS towards Nirvana. I mean - this is an insignificant B-side. Not notable as a standalone article. Should I go create Berkshire Poppies by Traffic? I could, but with the bias that exists towards bigger groups, cruft towards them is more likely to remain.h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 01:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to All Apologies, the single to which it was a B-side. Alone it's not a notable song, but it might be worth a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the track has no useOlliyeah (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to West Virginia. 72.151.55.27 (talk) 22:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable bands get more "bias" because they are more notable. And at least this stub adds some extra information with the potential for more. LonelyMarble (talk) 15:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

And to add one more thing since you specifically mentioned WP:BIAS. That page specifically says, "Generally, this project concentrates upon remedying omissions (entire topics, or particular sub-topics in extant articles) rather than on either (1) protesting inappropriate inclusions, or (2) trying to remedy issues of how material is presented." So I wouldn't use that argument. LonelyMarble (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to All Apologies and add the content there Thedarxide (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.