Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moises Moisty Abreu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moises Moisty Abreu[edit]

Moises Moisty Abreu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found explicitly good aside from here and here and while I'm fluent with Spanish, these sources are passing mentions at best and there isn't even solid details of his 1997 Miami Championship. As an orphan, there's also no move target and there's simply nothing to suggest improving and keeping. Notifying author XK8ER and tagger Qwertyus. SwisterTwister talk 22:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment:: a possible move target is Moisty Skate and Family, i.e., turn this into an article about the man's business instead of the man. It might just barely satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH due to coverage of its demise. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment:: this article by El Nuevo Día is exclusively about him: [1] but to be honest I'm not sure if he passes WP:GNG. Regarding the park, that definitely passes GNG even though I believe it closed it doors. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 22:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Can't find anything in the search engines to suggest this person meets the notability requirements. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.