Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsin Ejaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsin Ejaz[edit]

Mohsin Ejaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR has one single role according to iMDb and the rest are minor, and I question how major the other is as well. No meaningful coverage anywhere. Praxidicae (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Most of the roles listed are not verified in the article, and no source given does more than mention his name. However, there are quite a few hits on Google that look promising. The first one verifies that he is appearing in the TV show, so I added a ref for that to the article. I'd like to see that someone has at least looked through the first few pages of google hits before deciding that he is not notable. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did indeed under both spellings of his name. None of it is meaningful coverage of him. Praxidicae (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 07:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I originally PRODed the article for the same concerns and left a notability tag, which the article creator kept on removing without trying to improve the article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.