Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Avid (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Avid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant roles so fails WP:NACTOR, no claim to meeting WP:NMUSICIAN and the article is cited purely to passing mentions, social media, unreliable websites and paid-for spam. A WP:BEFORE search only yields more press releases and 'Brand Post' coverage in Influencive, Time Bulletin, The Open News and other blacklisted sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete - G5. Author of the article is global blocked. user:Persianmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:5EC0:B007:1563:F43D:131:422:B361 (talk) 22:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not correct. Page creator is neither globally or locally blocked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This actually refers to the original creator, if you check the deleted edits, the creator of those is globally locked. The IP cited the first AFD. The new incarnation of the article is not similar to the previous one, though. Geschichte (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete article created for an unknown non-notable subject, I couldn't find anything on the web that proved my assertion otherwise Mardetanha (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete non-notabl.--2A01:5EC0:B802:990E:2C59:6E24:3732:A35B (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.