Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohand Marg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ganderbal district#Mohand Marg. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohand Marg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was already content on this subject at Ganderbal district#Mohand Marg and so I merged the short piece of content of the new standalone article into the section in the Ganderbal district article and replaced the Mohand Marg stub with a redirect, per WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT.

The redirect has since been replaced with a copy and paste from the merged section by the new editor that created the article.

I believe the redirect should be reinstated. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be expanded and there is also a good amount of citation so I guess there is no need for deletion. Peerzada Iflaq (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Peerzada Mohammad Iflaq: If you re-read the nomination, you'll see that I am not calling for the article to be deleted, but to redirect to existing, almost the same content at Ganderbal district#Mohand Marg. More people will see the content there than in this standalone article. While more references have been added here, not all of them are reliable sources. The three that promote trekking businesses should not be included given that the same basic information about the place can be verified in other, more reliable, more independent publications. At least two of the books referenced are mere mentions. Most of the in-depth coverage is not actually about the Marg but about Aurel Stein's visits so could be used to expand that article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - I agree with the nominator; there is no justification for a stand-alone article. We lose nothing by restoring the redirect. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.