Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Shaheen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Shaheen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Previously draftified. Doing so again would be move warring Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Bahrain, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - press releases are never acceptable as sources (I can't find anything that isn't a press release). Aside from that, there is no actual significant coverage of this person. Article is likely UPE. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG, and I agree with Spiderone about UPE. BilledMammal (talk) 09:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: 100% of the references are churnalism. While this was an obvious candidate for CSD as WP:ADMASQ I chose AfD because I suspect UPE. I have placed a formal warning on the creating editor's talk page. Deletion at AfD will assist in preventing re-creation of this as another advert. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Press releases do not count towards establishing notability.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brandlife for a well deserved block. This cannot be speeded as created by a blocked user, but I think after the prescribed time, a snow delete close might be appropriate Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I moved the article into draft space explaining improvements. Still it does not look satisfy WP:RS hence fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 04:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article fails GNG and the person is not notable. Foodie Soul (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional and created in circumvention of a block (G5). Pikavoom ^Talk 07:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.