Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Mahbubul Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 03:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Mahbubul Islam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Early-career postdoctoral researcher. Citation record is decent for that stage of career, but far from what we usually take as notable here. Article is also quite spammy. No in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Topic fails the primary WP:GNG criterion. --OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 16:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - They're just not particularly notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google scholar citation counts not high enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1 (although they're heading in that direction) and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as there's nothing to suggest obvious improvement and my searches found nothing particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.