Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Jaweed Azmath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Jaweed Azmath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable for a separate article. Can be mentioned in 9/11 article if need arises. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lakun.patra Why? How many Google Books mention the arrests of Ayub Ali Khan and Mohammed Jaweed Azmath. Why doesn't the article mention both? In ictu oculi (talk) 13:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is probably an article somewhere that could touch on the imprisonment of these three men, but WP:EVENT and WP:BLP1E are relevant and we normally would not create a stand-alone article for a WP:PERP or WP:VICTIM with this type of coverage. Not sure if WP:UNDUE applies to templates, but listing them in Template:9-11 hijackers seems a bit excessive. - Location (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 15:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep - seems to be GNG case.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Create new list-type article, 9/11 detainees, and move this person & similar held-and-released (but otherwise non-notable) persons into it.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a single story does not make one notable. Bearian (talk) 04:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG.ரவி (talk) 10:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Reads just like a news story. Aerospeed (Talk) 15:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.