Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Akther Parvez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Akther Parvez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any sources establishing that this person meets WP:BIO. Fram (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: In addition to above deletion notes, the article was recently declined at AFC as "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article." Created by a user with a clear COI.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - entire article seems to be relying on this one source which is not sufficient at all Spiderone 13:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete other then some passing mention & couples of interview, no significant coverage in Bengali either. This is a promotional article created by paid editor/their employee. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure vanity piece, zero indication of notability. The FE 'article' (being the only one that looks even remotely RS) has clearly been written by the subject himself or his publicist, and makes even PRK media look unbiased! --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.