Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Baluch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers. Daniel (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Baluch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG is of no relevance; he has played a first class match and therefore passes WP:CRIN. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers or similar Has played 1 FC match, but no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has played 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GNG is the general notability guidelines so it is always relevant and it is failed here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers. No significant coverage so fails GNG, which trumps the trivial pass of NCRIC, which is by consensus a very weak SNG for cricketers such as this with very few recorded appearances. Redirection is an accepted ATD. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or redirect) per nom and also Rugbyfan22's analogy with WP:FOOTY, which is valid. — Alalch Emis (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.