Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamad Osseiran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamad Osseiran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally with 4 links, all dead, WP:BEFORE gave me absolutely 0 results, no sign of notability CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are countless ways in which the subject's name could be rendered in the Roman alphabet, so searches in it are unlikely to come up with anything. It needs someone who understand Arabic to search in that alphabet. I would point out that dead-linked sources were removed from the article (not by the nominator) before it was nominated here, although sources do not have to be available online. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I indeed forgot to search in arabic. I added some references but cannot say anything about if those sources are [[WP:RS]]. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very Weak keep. Shia Mufti of Sidon isn’t a very important role so does not carry anything like inherent notability. There is a fair sprinkling of press coverage, some of it local and not all of it in much depth. He only has 252 followers on Facebook though, where he seems to post uncontroversial things about once a month. I think this is a WP:GNG pass however.Mccapra (talk) 04:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 01:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Maybe I was being too generous. Don’t know. Mccapra (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.