Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moby Waller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moby Waller[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of financial blogger with no reliable in-depth secondary coverage. Article has been tagged with Notability, Sources, and Orphan for five years with no improvement. Searching today does not find any acceptable sources. MB 21:39, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable person in any sense. google search produces nothing. ArchieOof (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing at all close for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF, Delete by all means honestly. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable financial writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- strictly a vanity page. Insufficient RS coverage to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – promotional article created by single-purpose account with apparent conflict of interest. Citobun (talk) 10:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.