Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MobileSyrup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MobileSyrup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. not the slightest evidence for notability. Seems to be even an A7 speedy. DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - GNG not met, WP:NWEB not met. Paid editor doing low quality work. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's quite a well known resource for tech information and news. News media like Financial Post source considerable material from Mobile Syrup. I do realize that the article needs to be improved quite a lot for it to seem notable. In my opinion, the company seems notable on the face of it; but an interested editor would have to document the sources. I'm neutral about the delete. Lourdes 05:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If it's "well-known", there should be some evidence from reliable sources for that, and no, that their content gets used doesn't say much at all. --Calton | Talk 07:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.