Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoFizzay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MoFizzay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician unable to find any sources to believe that this person meets WP:Music Church ^Talk 06:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- nothing notable about the subject —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all three refs are adverts. No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NasssaNser 03:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. Dane2007 (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable Exemplo347 (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no convincing substance. SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing of note —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 10:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.