Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mkextunpack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mkextunpack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no reliable significant coverage. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 06:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 06:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found no reliable significant coverage either. —Codename Lisa (talk) 08:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up forum posts and incidental mentions, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA. Dialectric (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.