Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyasi Sandeepani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miyasi Sandeepani[edit]

Miyasi Sandeepani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. Could not find any WP:RS apart from a couple of gossip columns. Chanaka L (talk) 09:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the source assessment table.--Chanaka L (talk) 05:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Chanakal
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://gossip.hirufm.lk/9528/2016/05/hiru-gossip-interview-miyasi-sandeepani.html ~ WP:INTERVIEW No gossip site Yes No
https://www.gossip.lankahotnews.com/2019/07/miyasi-sandeepani.html ? inner frame throws a 404 error No gossip site ? 404 error No
https://www.saaravita.lk/new_pic/e0b6ade0b6bbe0b784e0b6ade0b78a-e0b6bae0b6b1e0b780e0b78f-e0b784e0b79/101-679698 ~ WP:INTERVIEW ? The editorial process of saaravita.lk is not known Yes ? Unknown
Interview with https://www.lankadeepa.lk/ ~ WP:INTERVIEW Yes Yes ~ Partial
http://sithma.com/hot_lanka/show.php?id=26124 ~ WP:INTERVIEW ? The editorial process of sithma.com is not known Yes ? Unknown
Interview with https://www.mawratanews.lk/ ~ WP:INTERVIEW ? The editorial process of mawratanews.lk is not known Yes ? Unknown
Interview with http://www.aruna.lk/ ~ WP:INTERVIEW ? The editorial process of aruna.lk is not known Yes ? Unknown
http://webgossip.lk/miyasi-sandeepani/ ~ WP:INTERVIEW No gossip site Yes No
Photoshoot on https://www.lankadeepa.lk/ Yes Yes No Mentions only the name, just a credit list No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-onipRJx8k No Primary source No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcaOVaA13ag No Primary source No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WblQ7_7_TsA No Primary source No
http://www.derana.lk/Ravana-Season-2-Teledrama No Primary source No
https://www.dailynews.lk/2017/06/27/features/120101/vimansa-mini-screen Yes Yes No No mention of her. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Not notable?? She had notable appearances in two historical television serials as well as a sub-lead role in a film. Also, there are many music videos appeared by her as the lead actress. Youtube videos means they are official music videos, not any tiktok videos or personal scraps. So, they should belong to her as notable appearances in music videos. There are many music video artists in Wiki from other countries even without a single notable citation. Check them. GihanJayaweeraTALK 13:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then those should be tagged and removed as well. I see no substantial and reliable sources here. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are telling me that local Sinhalese newspapers such as Lankadeepa, Dinamina, Aruna, Silumina are not reliable. Only English language newspapers are reliable. I have added three more reliable sources today. GihanJayaweeraTALK 17:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point out the good sources that are news, not interviews/primary sources? CT55555 (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, this maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON however based on her current body of work she fails the requirements of WP:NACTOR (in that she has not had any had significant roles in multiple notable films or television shows). The sources/references cited are primarily interviews with Sandeepani, which are considered primary sources and lack any independent secondary sources to verify the statements she makes. At this stage I can't see enough to satisfy WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete But will happily change my mind if anyone can point out a few good sources that are not interviews, YouTube links etc, but as it stands they are all weak sources as demonstrated in the table. CT55555 (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.