Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithun Chowdhury Mithun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This was a most unsatisfactory nomination: (a) it gave no reason for deletion, (b) it was placed only 31 minutes after the article was created; and (c) the article at the time of nomination stated that the subject was a member of the Bangladesh national team, hence clearly notable per WP:NFOOTY, and provided a reference which confirmed this. JohnCD (talk) 19:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mithun Chowdhury Mithun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

—AssassiN's Creed^(talk) 19:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep No reason for deletion has been given. Edward321 (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Argyle 4 Life^talk 20:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - no delete rationale provided. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As already stated above. Argyle 4 Life^talk 21:28, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. for reasons above even so has played at senior international level so is notable. Warburton1368 (talk) 22:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep - Nominators need to give some indication that they are aware of WP:BEFORE and that there is some substantial reason for deletion. This is one of a number of nominations by this editor with only the most flimsy of nomination rationales showing — in this case, nothing at all. Carrite (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NFOOTBALL, having competed at international level. Giant Snowman 09:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NFOOTBALL Whiteguru (talk) 12:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Too short article, though the player is notable. --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 12:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Keep Rticle has references and he is a football player, so it should be keep.--—AssassiN's Creed^(talk) 02:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]