Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitch Alison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 03:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mitch Alison[edit]
- Mitch Alison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Long-term unsourced BLP. Mainly a promo piece/CV, not sure anything is notable and I wasn't able to verify any of it in reliable sources independent of the subject. J04n(talk page) 12:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I could not verify sources either. The article confuses ad awards (if they are real) with personal awards.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete self promotional. possible WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As said above, this looks like an autobiography, even down to a "what I did on my holidays" section. No evidence of notability, unless it can be demonstrated that any of the (unreferenced) awards are more than routine. AllyD (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The "awards" are mostly Finalist, Shortlist or Entry!--Nixie9✉ 22:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.