Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misunderstood (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted as vanity. - Mike Rosoft 23:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstood (band)[edit]

Non-notable band, violates WP:MUSIC, vanity page. Static Universe 20:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete {{db-band}}. So tagged. -- IslaySolomon | talk 20:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The {{hangon}} message indicates, per the author, I believe this page should'nt be deleted because this is a band that could really make it and need to be publicised and i thought such a huge company such as wikipeia would'nt mind one more band being put on there website. That being said, CSD A7 applies, no assertion of notability; would be a delete regardless, due to WP:MUSIC, WP:COI, WP:NOT a crystal ball, and WP:ILIKEIT. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, they clearly have no idea what an encyclopaedia, let alone Wikipedia, is. -- IslaySolomon | talk 21:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - completely fails WP:BAND Jayden54 21:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. Also, that a band "could really make it and need to be publicised" does not assert any sort of notability, rather POV. —ShadowHalo 22:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete The only thing the article asserts is that there's no notability to be asserted. -- Kicking222 22:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.