Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistress sidonia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 22:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mistress sidonia[edit]

Does not seem to meet noticeably standards -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talk) 22:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. West Brom 4ever 22:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-per above ChrisLamb 23:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: She gets lots of google hits, but I'm not about to open any of them right now. Corvus cornix 23:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've braved opening a few and they just look like run of the mill porn sites to me, although I'll admit I'm no expert!--Farosdaughter 23:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'll cop to being an expert. This is just another run of the mill bdsm entrepreneur who's gone into the porn industry. There are probably a dozen women and a few men in every major city with the same talents and the same notability. She fails WP:BIO. Delete. --Charlene 02:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as a advertisment for a non-notable person and/or company and tagged as such. NeoFreak 03:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Without references (and foregoing the aforementioned google search) the subject does not appear to meet the criteria for WP:Notability Ozgod 05:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.