Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missional leader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 20:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Missional leader

Missional leader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a neologism, which comes from a single book. The adjective "missional" is notable, but we already have missional living. StAnselm (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - As per nomination. --Bobbyd2011 (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC) confirmed sockpuppet -- œ^™ 15:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• Comments: Said book was published in 2006. When does a neologism become an accepted phrase? In any case, I am not sure it has become well known outside a few Pentecostal churches. It is not used in the Council of Churches/Mainline churches. Perhaps a redirect to "Missional living" may be all that is needed for now. Wikipedia is not going anywhere soon, unless you believe The Rapture is coming in May 2011. Bearian (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Are you telling me Wikipedia is going to be Left Behind? In that case, I ain't going! --MelanieN (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.