Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Rejected

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Peter Laufer#Books. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Rejected[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK Veggies (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Books by Peter Laufer. Apparently the author of this article is attempting to create a unique article for every book written by Laufer. This is ill-advised as WP:NBOOK will make some or most of these difficult propositions for standalone articles. However they will have enough sources together to justify aggregating them under a single article with a sub-section for each book. This book for example has these sources: Democracy Now, C-Span, Washington Monthly, Orlando Weekly. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Peter Laufer#Books. -- Whpq (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Peter Laufer#Books - Essentially, the book is better known through him and doesn't stand out by itself as notable. I found several good links in Google News in addition to others here and here but I think it's better to simply redirect to the list of books. My thanks to the article creator's contributions though. SwisterTwister talk 22:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.