Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission:2110
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mission:2110[edit]
- Mission:2110 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable game show, no sources, no indication of importance. — Timneu22 · talk 12:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 23:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale No comments at all. Doesn't appear to be an obvious delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A click on the word "news" in the nomination shows that The Herald, The Scotsman and the Daily Mirror don't agree that this is an unremarkable show.[1][2][3] Phil Bridger (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.