Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss west virginia 2015 results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss west virginia 2015 results[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried twice to turn this article into a redirect, but the author reverted me both times. I think that this event does not fulfill criteria for standalone article. We do not have article for state beauty pageants for every year. The winner is listed at Miss West Virginia. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's enough that we list the winner of each year at Miss West Virginia. Listing various runners-up goes firmly into "lists of indiscriminate information" territory; these tables do not add encyclopedic content. Jeh (talk) 22:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; info only of interest to a few. Nate • (chatter) 09:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an unencyclopedic list. We have pretty much established the winner is not default notable, there is no reason to list below that anywhere.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unencyclopedic list. Each winner is listed in the primary article. -- Dane ^talk 01:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per comments already mentioned.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unencyclopedic list. Carrite (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.