Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Vicki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Vicki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, was married to someone notable, and that was 1 time event Mister vicky (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, and also, WP:ONEEVENT, she was briefly married to a notable singer, but this doesn't make her notable, does she have any other relevance to wikipedia? For further information about Tiny Tim, her article could be incorporated within Tiny Tim's one. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 17:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Tiny Tim, and the article name is incorrect, as well. Should be "Victoria Budinger". GoogolplexForce (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's interesting to note, however, the nominators name and contributions. I'm unaware as to the policies for this, but I'll leave a note on his talk page. GoogolplexForce (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tiny Tim (musician). Cullen328 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Cullen et al. I remember Miss Vicky's wedding (although I did not see it live, as I was a kid and asleep). She got her 15 minutes of fame, which is emblematic of NN. Bearian (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Cullen et al. Dismas|^(talk) 22:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Tiny Tim. This article and this subject are too slight for a stand alone article, in my opinion. A redirect to Tiny Tim should suffice. Carrite (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Tiny Tim w/ redirects Miss Vicki, Victoria Budinger, Victoria Khaury--Hokeman (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:N. This is detailed/direct coverage of the subject. She was the centerfold spread in Oui (magazine)'s October 1975 issue (11 photographs of coverage)^{[1] and I never thought I'd use a porn magazine appearance as evidence of notability!} Although the Carson show wedding was a WP:ONEEVENT it's also an event that's received at least 35 years of mentions in books and magazines^[2] including The Greatest Weddings of All Time (2002). Despite evidence of notable coverage I was thinking the article should be merged into Tiny Tim until I saw that in 2002 she popped back in the news as she was then the girlfriend of a guy convicted of murdering his wife^[3] That information would not be appropriate as part of the Tiny Tim article. --Marc Kupper|talk 09:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: You heathens should learn your American pop culture better, she really is notable and subject to much coverage a generation ago, and has been revisited frequently with news stories from 1969 through the present day.[4][5][6][7][8] [9][10][11]. In 1838-39, the tabloids celebrated Mary Rogers. In 1969-70, it was Miss Vicki, all notable American pop culture history. Nominator is blocked as a sock, so you should not assume good faith as to this nomination.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Milowent • ^talkblp-r 22:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Seems borderline WP:ONEEVENT but I'd give the article a chance.--Sloane (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She gives coverage not just for the marriage on the tonight show, but also for being famous even years later when they ended up on welfare, and when her marriage broke up. [12] Gets coverage of herself in detail Miss Vicki Whatever Happened To That Shy Little Girl, The Evening Independent, Sep 2, 1975 and elsewhere. Dream Focus 20:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.