Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International (United States)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Miss International (United States)[edit]
- Miss International (United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has been sourced by one primary source for years. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC) (added rationale at 03:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Miss International. —teb728 t c 06:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- These appear to be two completely separate organisations, judging by their websites http://www.miss-international.us/legal.php and http://www.miss-international.org/en/aboutICA.html Stuartyeates (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there are not enough sources for a stand-alone article (the best I found were local news pieces of the "Local person to go to the Miss International pageant" type), there is nothing to merge, and the title is not a likely search term so a redirect doesn't make any sense. Huon (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is actually the only recognized Miss International in both the US & the EU. This Miss International is the only one to carry the registered trademarked name. The Japan one is not recognized in the US or the EU as the legitimate Miss International. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.242.248 (talk) 21:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Articles of THIS - THE ONLY RECOGNIZED and TRADEMARKED MISS INTERNATIONAL BRAND (STATE & COUNTRY TITLEHOLDER) in the media:
http://www.cw23.com/dpp/winging_it/meeting-miss-international
http://www.lsureveille.com/entertainment/article_205f9278-d962-11e2-b728-0019bb30f31a.html
http://www.ukdentalnews.co.uk/?p=1383
http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2013/03/miss_international_hoboken_con.html?fb_action_ids=10104201863917914&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=s%3DshowShareBarUI%3Ap%3Dfacebook-like&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.242.248 (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All of this Miss International Social Media:
http://theinternationalpageants.blogspot.com/
www.twitter.com/intlpageants
https://www.facebook.com/groups/352336657220/
http://pinterest.com/intlpageants/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.242.248 (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BJTcZIPCUAE0yxo.jpg This photo features a former Miss International (this US based - but not US only system) titleholder on the cover of Supermodels Magazine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.242.248 (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I invite you to read WP:CORPDEPTH which is our inclusion criteria for such things. What we are looking for is in-depth independent coverage of the organisation as an organisation. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.trademarkia.com/miss-international-85652392.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntlPageants (talk • contribs) 21:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a machine-generate page by Trademarkia based on a trademark application / registration with the USPTO by the subject. The trademark application was produced by the subject (and /or it's representative) and is thus not independent. The machine-generated page contains no independent coverage, because it is purely based on the USPTO-derived content which is not independent. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, given the discussion here. Wikipedia is not the place to litigate trademark disputes. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.