Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Global United

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Global United[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This pageant doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. I could find no coverage, other than local news stories in the vein of "Someone from our town will be in the pageant". I couldn't find any coverage of the pageant itself from significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Failed to meet WP:GNG. --Richie Campbell (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, does not pass even minimal requirements of WP:42. --Jayron 32 21:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - minor, run of the mill, recent pageant. Bearian (talk) 20:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.