Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mishal Bukhari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mishal Bukhari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not many WP:RS to verify her claims in this biography per WP:V. Many things written are per WP:OR. No notable award. Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. Greenbörg (talk) 09:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. look like an autiobio. i couldn't find anything in RS on her so she fails WP:GNG. --Saqib (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also is such a WP:PROMOTION violation that it should be WP:TNTed. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.