Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute (MARI)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misdiagnosis Association and Research Institute (MARI)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines; no reference to this in RS. This organization is not even launched yet, WP:crystalball. May qualify for CSD G11 Habiliment (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 09:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an advert without any references. Rathfelder (talk) 11:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability cannot be established. All content is self-generated (e.g. YouTube). The website linked to the article doesn't exist. Can be revisited if notability becomes more defined. JFW | T@lk 14:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth sources to pass either WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - References fail to clear the hurdle of WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, or WP:ORGDEPTH. The article itself is irrevocably promotional; requiring a rebuild from the ground up if we were to try for an article in the future. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.